Recommendations Follow up plans
Recommendations
- Provide information on the identified GCA for the KPBU. It was explained in a previous section that there are different ways to identify the appropriate GCA for a KPBU project. Once a GCA is identified it becomes the recommended GCA to take forth the preparation of the KPBU project. Hence, explain how and why the identified GCA is the most appropriate one for the KPBU project.
- A previous section explained how determining the KBPU form is part of preparing the initial indications of the project plan. The form of a project is the type of infrastructure provision comprises integrated activities including design, construction, financing, asset transfer, and/or asset management transfer. These activities can be integrated with costs, responsibilities, and risks that determine the form of the project. Here, explain how and why the recommended form is the most appropriate one for the KPBU project
- The qualitative VFM assessment conducted in a previous section used the main criteria such as quality (project and service), risk management, market interest, budget certainty, project implementation time, design, construction, and commissioning and Value for Money (VFM) factor and supporting criteria such as operational flexibility, possibility of future scope changes, stakeholder management etc. to determine the most suitable infrastructure provision method for the minister/institution head/regional head/SoE directorate. Here, explain how and why the recommended infrastructure provision method derived using the criteria for qualitative VFM is the most appropriate one for the KPBU project.
-
The GCA shall explain the need for government support. Government support may be required in one or more forms as below.
(1) Feasibility support from the minister responsible for state finance affairs,
(2) tax incentive,
(3) other government support from minister/institution head/regional head/SoE directorate/director of Regionally-Owned Enterprise, as per regulations, such as (a) ministry/agency/SOE/Regional-Owned Enterprise expenditures, for example, partial construction support (b) grant (c) regional incentive fund (d) special physical allocation fund (e) special non-physical allocation fund (f) regional loan and/or (g) regional investment.
- Provide details on the minimum technical and financial capabilities/ criteria of the business entity for implementing the KBPU.
Planned Schedule and Implementation of Infrastructure Provision
- Ensure that the planned schedule and stages of implementation of the infrastructure provision at least contain the activities that must be carried out at each stage, items that must be followed up from time to time from the various entities/stakeholders involved, the person/s responsible for these activities and the expected output of these activities. For example, the GCA conducts public consultations resulting in minutes as the output of public consultation.
FollowUp
- Detail out the follow-up plan for the recommendations presented in previous responses. Include in this detailing, the targeted timeframe to achieve these follow-up actions. For example, if there is a challenge related to coordination with stakeholders about land provision, specify the timeframe for target resolution for the coordination issues. Also detail out the budget planning for preparation and transaction activities.